A Cognitive Flaw: Have you ever realized the education system crammed a fundamental logical fallacy into your head?

Sitting on school benches for so many years, we are constantly crammed with seemingly profound quotes, carefully framed in moral lectures, but which actually conceal incredibly lazy thinking. Among those countless dogmas, two sayings are revered as guiding compasses of truth, yet they represent the pinnacle of absurdity if we examine them under the light of data science and biology. Those are the immortal quote "A half-truth is not a truth" and its close cousin "Seeing is believing." Today, let's brew a good pot of tea together, put on our critical thinking glasses, and slowly peel back the clunky logic of these ideologies.

To begin our debunking crusade, let's dissect what is called the truth. People often whisper to each other on the podium a very catchy analogy that half a loaf of bread is still a loaf of bread, but half a truth is definitely a lie. It sounds like a wonderful moral teaching about absolute honesty. However, if you are someone who works with data or simply possesses a bit of sharp logical thinking, you will realize that demanding a whole, solid truth is a delusional fantasy. In this vast, ever-expanding universe, there is no such thing as an absolute truth. Everything we perceive, record, and evaluate is merely the result of the brain trying to decode countless chaotic signals from the surrounding environment. What humanity proudly calls the "truth" is essentially just a finite set of observations. When you loudly declare that half a truth is not a truth, it is no different from standing before the ocean and saying that half a liter of seawater is not seawater simply because it isn't enough to fill the entire ocean. Seawater is still seawater, and collected actual data always holds value in forming information, no matter how little or how much there is.

Looking at this issue more systematically from a scientific perspective, every stream of information in this world is made up of two distinct halves. One half is the raw, original data, and the other half is the constructed, or modeled, data. Raw data are naked, cold, and entirely soulless numbers. It is the thirty-seven degrees Celsius displayed on a thermometer, or the sixty kilometers per hour flashing on a car's speedometer. These numbers themselves do not tell any story at all. For them to become meaningful information that humans can digest, we absolutely need the other half: the process of contextual construction. When you combine the raw data of sixty kilometers per hour with the constructed context of a car speeding through a school zone during rush hour, only then do you get the complete information that the driver is breaking the law and causing extreme danger. Without the constructed data portion, measured numbers are just a pile of worthless garbage. Conversely, without the solid foundation of raw data, all inferences are merely dreamy hallucinations of the mind.

Therefore, when the education system inadvertently promotes a mindset that only accepts a one-hundred-percent truth and rejects anything that offers only a half, they are sowing an incredibly stunted mindset in terms of technical and analytical skills into the heads of countless generations of students. Imagine if great scientists also brought that mindset into the laboratory; human civilization would surely have collapsed long ago. No oceanographer is idle enough to measure the temperature of every single drop of water in the entire Pacific Ocean to draw conclusions about global warming. They take half the data, or realistically just one-millionth of the data, and then use mathematical models to extrapolate and construct the big picture. Science operates on sample sizes, and denying the value of incomplete samples means denying the foundation of the entire human knowledge system. Those who casually criticize a "half-truth" are often just lazy thinkers, unwilling to expend brainpower to process and assemble the missing fifty percent of contextual puzzle pieces from others.

However, this stubborn desire to seek an absolute, monolithic truth does not spontaneously arise from nowhere. It stems from another flawed belief deeply rooted in human cognition since the dawn of time and continually reinforced through schooling. That is the blind faith in one's own eyes, summed up in the truth "seeing is believing." Humans always possess excessive pride in their own divine observational abilities. We assume that the world we see is the actual, original, and undeniable reality. But alas, if we fairly place human eyes on a biological scale, they are nothing but terrible optical recording devices riddled with ridiculous technical glitches.

Let's talk about the electromagnetic spectrum to see just how blind we really are. Our fragile biological eyes are only capable of perceiving an incredibly tiny fraction of the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves existing in the universe, which is the visible light region. We are completely helpless against infrared rays, ultraviolet rays, radio waves, or X-rays. Right at this very moment, all around you, penetrating through space and even right through your body, are billions of cellphone signals, wireless network waves, and cosmic radiation dancing frantically. You cannot see them at all. The gravity pinning you to this chair is also an invisible entity. If you truly applied the "seeing is believing" philosophy to its ultimate extreme, you would have to immediately throw away your smartphone, deny the existence of gravity, and convince yourself that you are floating in an empty void. Believing only in what the eyes record is the act of trapping oneself in a narrow well of severe scientific ignorance.

But nature's mockery of the human eye doesn't stop at those physical limitations. Not only restricted in light reception, our visual system also has a massive design flaw called the blind spot. The blind spot is where the optic nerves bundle together to pass through the retina and connect to the brain. At that location, there are absolutely no photoreceptor cells. This means that in your field of vision, there are always two pitch-black holes right in front of your eyes. Yet, you never see those two black holes in normal daily life. Where does this mystery come from?

The answer is that this is when our magnificent brain shows off its direct copy-pasting skills like professional photo editing software. The brain cannot accept the existence of crude holes in the picture of reality, so it automatically takes color and texture data from around the blind spot to patch up the empty space. Yes, you heard that right. At any given moment, a portion of the image you are seeing and blindly believing in is actually fake, drawn up by the brain itself, self-deluding to comfort its owner. The image you see is not a rigid truth, but rather it goes right back to the scientific formula we discussed earlier. What you see consists of one half true light data hitting the retina, and the other half data written and directed by the brain, constructed based on past experiences. The optical illusions you often see online, where static images appear to move, or identical colors look different, are the clearest biological proof that the brain continuously processes and cooks up raw data.

And so, we have completed a perfect logical loop. Those who loudly proclaim that a half-truth is a lie are often the same people who stubbornly cling to the "seeing is believing" principle. They fail to realize that the very act of "seeing" they are so incredibly proud of, in essence, only provides them with exactly one half of true data, while the other half has been tragically molded by a neural machine full of biases and a penchant for speculation. Demanding flawless perfection in information when one's own information-receiving tool is a broken, glitch-filled camera, isn't that the most hilarious joke the education system has accidentally implanted into our thinking?

Finally, the time has come for us to wake up and remove the dreamy rose-colored glasses about a clearly black-and-white world. The truth has never been a monolithic block of stone lying dormant waiting for us to admire and carry home whole. It is like an endless continuous flow of data, where each observer will scoop up a different ladle of water, adding in their own distinct contextual spices of personal experience. Accepting that all information is merely relative, that a half-truth is still an invaluable clue, and that our eyes always have dark blind spots, that is the manifestation of a mature, sharp, and highly scientific mindset. Stop demanding an unrealistic perfection. Instead, train to become smart data processors, knowing how to pick up every single tiny puzzle piece, knowing how to doubt even your own eyes, and knowing how to use sober reason to compensate for the modeled data portions that are still missing. Because it is far better to possess a half-truth and know how to use your intellect to make it whole, than to squeeze your eyes shut, sink into the darkness of ignorance, and delude yourself into believing that nothing in this world is real.

Read more in Vietnamese